Jeremy has been thinking about when the ends justify the means, a topic I’ve been thinking about a lot as of late as well.
When do the ends justify the means? Isn’t the whole point of having principles that they hold true even in the direst circumstances? Why even claim that corporations shouldn’t influence politics if you’re going to make an exception for net neutrality? Why even claim that free speech is sacrosanct if you make an exception for nazi scum?
Those two examples are pretty extreme and I can easily justify the exceptions to myself. Net neutrality is too important. Stopping fascism is too important. But where do I draw the line? At what point does something become “too important?”
It’s a lovely post that connects dots between censorship, AMP, HTTPS as a requirement for new features and more.