http://timkadlec.com/2008/03/quicker-dom-traversing-with-css-selectors/ A Wisconsin based web developer writing about the web. Sat, 21 Jan 2012 04:29:25 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://timkadlec.com/2008/03/quicker-dom-traversing-with-css-selectors/comment-page-1/#comment-58 Chris Wed, 05 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0000 http://localhost/1969/12/quicker-dom-traversing-with-css-selectors/#comment-58 I should mention that the results Robert Biggs has is not using the API you mentioned. He is mentioned the Slickspeed test which tests how various libraries do DOM selection. I should mention that the results Robert Biggs has is not using the API you mentioned. He is mentioned the Slickspeed test which tests how various libraries do DOM selection.

]]> http://timkadlec.com/2008/03/quicker-dom-traversing-with-css-selectors/comment-page-1/#comment-59 Tim Kadlec Wed, 05 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0000 http://localhost/1969/12/quicker-dom-traversing-with-css-selectors/#comment-59 @Chris - Actually, the SlickSpeed test does indeed test for the selector API. It runs the tests using the libraries, but also runs the test using native browser support. @Chris – Actually, the SlickSpeed test does indeed test for the selector API. It runs the tests using the libraries, but also runs the test using native browser support.

]]> http://timkadlec.com/2008/03/quicker-dom-traversing-with-css-selectors/comment-page-1/#comment-60 Chris Wed, 05 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0000 http://localhost/1969/12/quicker-dom-traversing-with-css-selectors/#comment-60 @Tim: I know. I realized that right after I added the comment. Actually, what I remember looking at was the DOMAssistant version of Slickspeed not the one referenced by Robert. @Tim: I know. I realized that right after I added the comment. Actually, what I remember looking at was the DOMAssistant version of Slickspeed not the one referenced by Robert.

]]> http://timkadlec.com/2008/03/quicker-dom-traversing-with-css-selectors/comment-page-1/#comment-49979 Chris Wed, 05 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0000 http://localhost/1969/12/quicker-dom-traversing-with-css-selectors/#comment-49979 I should mention that the results Robert Biggs has is not using the API you mentioned. He is mentioned the Slickspeed test which tests how various libraries do DOM selection. I should mention that the results Robert Biggs has is not using the API you mentioned. He is mentioned the Slickspeed test which tests how various libraries do DOM selection.

]]> http://timkadlec.com/2008/03/quicker-dom-traversing-with-css-selectors/comment-page-1/#comment-49980 Tim Kadlec Wed, 05 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0000 http://localhost/1969/12/quicker-dom-traversing-with-css-selectors/#comment-49980 @Chris - Actually, the SlickSpeed test does indeed test for the selector API. It runs the tests using the libraries, but also runs the test using native browser support. @Chris – Actually, the SlickSpeed test does indeed test for the selector API. It runs the tests using the libraries, but also runs the test using native browser support.

]]> http://timkadlec.com/2008/03/quicker-dom-traversing-with-css-selectors/comment-page-1/#comment-49981 Chris Wed, 05 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0000 http://localhost/1969/12/quicker-dom-traversing-with-css-selectors/#comment-49981 @Tim: I know. I realized that right after I added the comment. Actually, what I remember looking at was the DOMAssistant version of Slickspeed not the one referenced by Robert. @Tim: I know. I realized that right after I added the comment. Actually, what I remember looking at was the DOMAssistant version of Slickspeed not the one referenced by Robert.

]]>