<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Using Prototypes in Javascript</title>
	<atom:link href="http://timkadlec.com/2008/01/using-prototypes-in-javascript/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://timkadlec.com/2008/01/using-prototypes-in-javascript/</link>
	<description>A Wisconsin based web developer writing about the web.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 20:42:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://timkadlec.com/2008/01/using-prototypes-in-javascript/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/1969/12/using-prototypes-in-javascript/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I think your right about that coming from the AJAX library, I&#039;m trying to figure out more advanced javascript lately.  Is there a convention about the &#039;$&#039; character being used for variable.  Sometimes the stupidest thing can hang you up when your unfamiliar with a language.  I thought I used to know javascript pretty well, but now I realize people are taking it a lot farther.&lt;br /&gt;BTW:  Your site looks and works really great.  What Blog software do you use?  (you could email me that part :))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I think your right about that coming from the AJAX library, I&#8217;m trying to figure out more advanced javascript lately.  Is there a convention about the &#8216;$&#8217; character being used for variable.  Sometimes the stupidest thing can hang you up when your unfamiliar with a language.  I thought I used to know javascript pretty well, but now I realize people are taking it a lot farther.<br />BTW:  Your site looks and works really great.  What Blog software do you use?  (you could email me that part :))</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://timkadlec.com/2008/01/using-prototypes-in-javascript/comment-page-1/#comment-49996</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/1969/12/using-prototypes-in-javascript/#comment-49996</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I think your right about that coming from the AJAX library, I&#039;m trying to figure out more advanced javascript lately.  Is there a convention about the &#039;$&#039; character being used for variable.  Sometimes the stupidest thing can hang you up when your unfamiliar with a language.  I thought I used to know javascript pretty well, but now I realize people are taking it a lot farther.BTW:  Your site looks and works really great.  What Blog software do you use?  (you could email me that part :))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I think your right about that coming from the AJAX library, I&#8217;m trying to figure out more advanced javascript lately.  Is there a convention about the &#8216;$&#8217; character being used for variable.  Sometimes the stupidest thing can hang you up when your unfamiliar with a language.  I thought I used to know javascript pretty well, but now I realize people are taking it a lot farther.BTW:  Your site looks and works really great.  What Blog software do you use?  (you could email me that part :))</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Kadlec</title>
		<link>http://timkadlec.com/2008/01/using-prototypes-in-javascript/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Kadlec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/1969/12/using-prototypes-in-javascript/#comment-17</guid>
		<description>@Adam - Actually, what you are showing there simply makes $get and Sys.UI.DomElement.getElementById call the same function. Correct me if I&#039;m wrong, but I think that is from the ASP.NET AJAX Framework set up by Microsoft. I&#039;m pretty sure that right in the framework, they offer $get as a shortcut for the otherwise long winded call.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Adam &#8211; Actually, what you are showing there simply makes $get and Sys.UI.DomElement.getElementById call the same function. Correct me if I&#8217;m wrong, but I think that is from the ASP.NET AJAX Framework set up by Microsoft. I&#8217;m pretty sure that right in the framework, they offer $get as a shortcut for the otherwise long winded call.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Kadlec</title>
		<link>http://timkadlec.com/2008/01/using-prototypes-in-javascript/comment-page-1/#comment-49995</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Kadlec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/1969/12/using-prototypes-in-javascript/#comment-49995</guid>
		<description>@Adam - Actually, what you are showing there simply makes $get and Sys.UI.DomElement.getElementById call the same function. Correct me if I&#039;m wrong, but I think that is from the ASP.NET AJAX Framework set up by Microsoft. I&#039;m pretty sure that right in the framework, they offer $get as a shortcut for the otherwise long winded call.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Adam &#8211; Actually, what you are showing there simply makes $get and Sys.UI.DomElement.getElementById call the same function. Correct me if I&#8217;m wrong, but I think that is from the ASP.NET AJAX Framework set up by Microsoft. I&#8217;m pretty sure that right in the framework, they offer $get as a shortcut for the otherwise long winded call.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://timkadlec.com/2008/01/using-prototypes-in-javascript/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/1969/12/using-prototypes-in-javascript/#comment-16</guid>
		<description>So does this explain something that I&#039;ve been seeing recently a lot and don&#039;t understand:&lt;br /&gt;var $get = Sys.UI.DomElement.getElementById = function Sys$UI$DomElement$getElementById(id, element) { .........&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Firebug lists $get as a prototype, but I don&#039;t understand what&#039;s going on here.&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So does this explain something that I&#8217;ve been seeing recently a lot and don&#8217;t understand:<br />var $get = Sys.UI.DomElement.getElementById = function Sys$UI$DomElement$getElementById(id, element) { &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>Firebug lists $get as a prototype, but I don&#8217;t understand what&#8217;s going on here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://timkadlec.com/2008/01/using-prototypes-in-javascript/comment-page-1/#comment-49994</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/1969/12/using-prototypes-in-javascript/#comment-49994</guid>
		<description>So does this explain something that I&#039;ve been seeing recently a lot and don&#039;t understand:var $get = Sys.UI.DomElement.getElementById = function Sys$UI$DomElement$getElementById(id, element) { .........Firebug lists $get as a prototype, but I don&#039;t understand what&#039;s going on here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So does this explain something that I&#8217;ve been seeing recently a lot and don&#8217;t understand:var $get = Sys.UI.DomElement.getElementById = function Sys$UI$DomElement$getElementById(id, element) { &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;Firebug lists $get as a prototype, but I don&#8217;t understand what&#8217;s going on here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert S. Robbins</title>
		<link>http://timkadlec.com/2008/01/using-prototypes-in-javascript/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert S. Robbins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/1969/12/using-prototypes-in-javascript/#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Wow, this will be great for the next time I need to create a Dog or Pet object! Seriously though, programmers should use more meaningful examples. I only read this blog post because I recently found a String.prototype.trim function that is useful for trimming strings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, this will be great for the next time I need to create a Dog or Pet object! Seriously though, programmers should use more meaningful examples. I only read this blog post because I recently found a String.prototype.trim function that is useful for trimming strings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert S. Robbins</title>
		<link>http://timkadlec.com/2008/01/using-prototypes-in-javascript/comment-page-1/#comment-49993</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert S. Robbins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/1969/12/using-prototypes-in-javascript/#comment-49993</guid>
		<description>Wow, this will be great for the next time I need to create a Dog or Pet object! Seriously though, programmers should use more meaningful examples. I only read this blog post because I recently found a String.prototype.trim function that is useful for trimming strings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, this will be great for the next time I need to create a Dog or Pet object! Seriously though, programmers should use more meaningful examples. I only read this blog post because I recently found a String.prototype.trim function that is useful for trimming strings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://timkadlec.com/2008/01/using-prototypes-in-javascript/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/1969/12/using-prototypes-in-javascript/#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Simple but great post. I like it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simple but great post. I like it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://timkadlec.com/2008/01/using-prototypes-in-javascript/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/1969/12/using-prototypes-in-javascript/#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Good intro to prototypes. One thing I noticed that might leave the novice developer confused is the call() method. There is no mention of where the method is defined.  This might be obvious to the more experienced developers, but the dumbed down explanation would surely help the beginners.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Other than that, great stuff. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good intro to prototypes. One thing I noticed that might leave the novice developer confused is the call() method. There is no mention of where the method is defined.  This might be obvious to the more experienced developers, but the dumbed down explanation would surely help the beginners.</p>
<p>Other than that, great stuff. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

