<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IE&#039;s Questionable Version Targeting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://timkadlec.com/2008/01/ies-questionable-version-targeting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://timkadlec.com/2008/01/ies-questionable-version-targeting/</link>
	<description>A Wisconsin based web developer writing about the web.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 20:42:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://timkadlec.com/2008/01/ies-questionable-version-targeting/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/1969/12/ies-questionable-version-targeting/#comment-37</guid>
		<description>Well looks like some of us got what we wanted?&lt;br /&gt;http://www.webstandards.org/2008/03/03/microsoft-rethinks-ie8s-default-behavior/&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Nice to see the community can have an impact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well looks like some of us got what we wanted?<br /><a href="http://www.webstandards.org/2008/03/03/microsoft-rethinks-ie8s-default-behavior/" rel="nofollow">http://www.webstandards.org/2008/03/03/microsoft-rethinks-ie8s-default-behavior/</a></p>
<p>Nice to see the community can have an impact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://timkadlec.com/2008/01/ies-questionable-version-targeting/comment-page-1/#comment-49986</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/1969/12/ies-questionable-version-targeting/#comment-49986</guid>
		<description>Well looks like some of us got what we wanted?http://www.webstandards.org/2008/03/03/microsoft-rethinks-ie8s-default-behavior/Nice to see the community can have an impact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well looks like some of us got what we wanted?<a href="http://www.webstandards.org/2008/03/03/microsoft-rethinks-ie8s-default-behavior/Nice" rel="nofollow">http://www.webstandards.org/2008/03/03/microsoft-rethinks-ie8s-default-behavior/Nice</a> to see the community can have an impact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Psyberserf</title>
		<link>http://timkadlec.com/2008/01/ies-questionable-version-targeting/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Psyberserf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/1969/12/ies-questionable-version-targeting/#comment-36</guid>
		<description>My first thought is that it&#039;s about time IE came up with a way for designers to control the layout across multiple platforms. And then I have to stop in my tracks a say, &#039;If Microsoft would simply abide by the rules of the W3C in the first place, to create a browser that uses established standards, then they wouldn&#039;t have to be designing a widget to fix their problems.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The solution is to meet standards. Period!&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My first thought is that it&#8217;s about time IE came up with a way for designers to control the layout across multiple platforms. And then I have to stop in my tracks a say, &#8216;If Microsoft would simply abide by the rules of the W3C in the first place, to create a browser that uses established standards, then they wouldn&#8217;t have to be designing a widget to fix their problems.</p>
<p>The solution is to meet standards. Period!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Psyberserf</title>
		<link>http://timkadlec.com/2008/01/ies-questionable-version-targeting/comment-page-1/#comment-49985</link>
		<dc:creator>Psyberserf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/1969/12/ies-questionable-version-targeting/#comment-49985</guid>
		<description>My first thought is that it&#039;s about time IE came up with a way for designers to control the layout across multiple platforms. And then I have to stop in my tracks a say, &#039;If Microsoft would simply abide by the rules of the W3C in the first place, to create a browser that uses established standards, then they wouldn&#039;t have to be designing a widget to fix their problems.The solution is to meet standards. Period!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My first thought is that it&#8217;s about time IE came up with a way for designers to control the layout across multiple platforms. And then I have to stop in my tracks a say, &#8216;If Microsoft would simply abide by the rules of the W3C in the first place, to create a browser that uses established standards, then they wouldn&#8217;t have to be designing a widget to fix their problems.The solution is to meet standards. Period!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://timkadlec.com/2008/01/ies-questionable-version-targeting/comment-page-1/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/1969/12/ies-questionable-version-targeting/#comment-33</guid>
		<description>Wouldn&#039;t it just be simpler to make IE8 fully standards compliant - that way no-one would need to add any extra lines of anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t it just be simpler to make IE8 fully standards compliant &#8211; that way no-one would need to add any extra lines of anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Kadlec</title>
		<link>http://timkadlec.com/2008/01/ies-questionable-version-targeting/comment-page-1/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Kadlec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/1969/12/ies-questionable-version-targeting/#comment-34</guid>
		<description>@Tony - Actually, the issue is that IE8 is going to be at least closer to fully standards compliant. As a result, there will be rendering differences between it and IE7, and they are trying to come up with a way to not &#039;break&#039; layouts already out there - hence the X-UA-Compatible declaration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tony &#8211; Actually, the issue is that IE8 is going to be at least closer to fully standards compliant. As a result, there will be rendering differences between it and IE7, and they are trying to come up with a way to not &#8216;break&#8217; layouts already out there &#8211; hence the X-UA-Compatible declaration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike2</title>
		<link>http://timkadlec.com/2008/01/ies-questionable-version-targeting/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/1969/12/ies-questionable-version-targeting/#comment-35</guid>
		<description>I guess you are happier with &lt;!--[if IE 7]&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess you are happier with &lt;!&#8211;[if IE 7]&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://timkadlec.com/2008/01/ies-questionable-version-targeting/comment-page-1/#comment-49982</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/1969/12/ies-questionable-version-targeting/#comment-49982</guid>
		<description>Wouldn&#039;t it just be simpler to make IE8 fully standards compliant - that way no-one would need to add any extra lines of anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t it just be simpler to make IE8 fully standards compliant &#8211; that way no-one would need to add any extra lines of anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Kadlec</title>
		<link>http://timkadlec.com/2008/01/ies-questionable-version-targeting/comment-page-1/#comment-49983</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Kadlec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/1969/12/ies-questionable-version-targeting/#comment-49983</guid>
		<description>@Tony - Actually, the issue is that IE8 is going to be at least closer to fully standards compliant. As a result, there will be rendering differences between it and IE7, and they are trying to come up with a way to not &#039;break&#039; layouts already out there - hence the X-UA-Compatible declaration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tony &#8211; Actually, the issue is that IE8 is going to be at least closer to fully standards compliant. As a result, there will be rendering differences between it and IE7, and they are trying to come up with a way to not &#8216;break&#8217; layouts already out there &#8211; hence the X-UA-Compatible declaration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike2</title>
		<link>http://timkadlec.com/2008/01/ies-questionable-version-targeting/comment-page-1/#comment-49984</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/1969/12/ies-questionable-version-targeting/#comment-49984</guid>
		<description>I guess you are happier with &lt;!--[if IE 7]&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess you are happier with &lt;!&#8211;[if IE 7]&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

