<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Detailed Look at Stacking in CSS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://timkadlec.com/2008/01/detailed-look-at-stacking-in-css/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://timkadlec.com/2008/01/detailed-look-at-stacking-in-css/</link>
	<description>A Wisconsin based web developer writing about the web.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 17:23:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niels Matthijs</title>
		<link>http://timkadlec.com/2008/01/detailed-look-at-stacking-in-css/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Niels Matthijs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/1969/12/detailed-look-at-stacking-in-css/#comment-44</guid>
		<description>Great article, although I didn&#039;t really find what I hoped to find :)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I&#039;ve read up on the stacking before as I hit a nasty IE6 bug at some time. You mention that FF gets it wrong, but so does IE6, creating a new stack context whenever it hits position:relative. This makes it impossible to create some layouts.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It would be nice if you could take a look at a test page I made some time ago.The setup is simple, the question is how to fix it without tampering with the setup (so no source changes etc)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://users.pandora.be/onderhond/test_IE6_zindex.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article, although I didn&#8217;t really find what I hoped to find :)</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve read up on the stacking before as I hit a nasty IE6 bug at some time. You mention that FF gets it wrong, but so does IE6, creating a new stack context whenever it hits position:relative. This makes it impossible to create some layouts.</p>
<p>It would be nice if you could take a look at a test page I made some time ago.The setup is simple, the question is how to fix it without tampering with the setup (so no source changes etc)</p>
<p><a href="http://users.pandora.be/onderhond/test_IE6_zindex.html" rel="nofollow">http://users.pandora.be/onderhond/test_IE6_zindex.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thierry</title>
		<link>http://timkadlec.com/2008/01/detailed-look-at-stacking-in-css/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Thierry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/1969/12/detailed-look-at-stacking-in-css/#comment-45</guid>
		<description>This is an interactive demo:&lt;br /&gt;http://tjkdesign.com/articles/z-index/teach_yourself_how_elements_stack.asp&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It demonstrates the IE issue mentioned by Niels in a previous comment</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an interactive demo:<br /><a href="http://tjkdesign.com/articles/z-index/teach_yourself_how_elements_stack.asp" rel="nofollow">http://tjkdesign.com/articles/z-index/teach_yourself_how_elements_stack.asp</a></p>
<p>It demonstrates the IE issue mentioned by Niels in a previous comment</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Kadlec</title>
		<link>http://timkadlec.com/2008/01/detailed-look-at-stacking-in-css/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Kadlec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/1969/12/detailed-look-at-stacking-in-css/#comment-46</guid>
		<description>Good stuff guys! Thierry&#039;s demo is a nice way to get some hands on experience playing with stacking.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;@Niels - Actually, IE7 appears to still get that wrong as well. Unfortunately, without redoing the markup, I can only see on CSS fix. If you take the position relative off of the bottom div and then position the bottom&#039;s sub division in relation to the body you can avoid the bug. That&#039;s the only thing I can think of there though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good stuff guys! Thierry&#8217;s demo is a nice way to get some hands on experience playing with stacking.</p>
<p>@Niels &#8211; Actually, IE7 appears to still get that wrong as well. Unfortunately, without redoing the markup, I can only see on CSS fix. If you take the position relative off of the bottom div and then position the bottom&#8217;s sub division in relation to the body you can avoid the bug. That&#8217;s the only thing I can think of there though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Website Magazine</title>
		<link>http://timkadlec.com/2008/01/detailed-look-at-stacking-in-css/comment-page-1/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Website Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/1969/12/detailed-look-at-stacking-in-css/#comment-42</guid>
		<description>Very timely for me as I just started working on a project where this will come in handy - thanks much!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very timely for me as I just started working on a project where this will come in handy &#8211; thanks much!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Kadlec</title>
		<link>http://timkadlec.com/2008/01/detailed-look-at-stacking-in-css/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Kadlec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/1969/12/detailed-look-at-stacking-in-css/#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment! Glad to hear the article was useful for you. Actually, you can thank one of my colleagues for the timing. He got frustrated working with the z-index the other day and requested more information on the topic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment! Glad to hear the article was useful for you. Actually, you can thank one of my colleagues for the timing. He got frustrated working with the z-index the other day and requested more information on the topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
